Legal Literacy - This article discusses the concept of contempt of court which includes the definition, scope, and legal arrangements in Indonesia and several other countries. In general, contempt of court it is defined as an act that ignores or violates court orders, either directly or indirectly, which can degrade the authority and dignity of the judiciary. This article also outlines the differences between civil contempt and criminal contempt, and provides examples of well-known cases in Indonesia, such as the cases of Adnan Buyung Nasution and Desrizal Chaniago. In addition, the discussion includes regulations governing contempt of court at the international level, such as in Australia, the United States, England, and India. This article concludes with the importance of strict rule enforcement to maintain the honor of the judicial institution.

The Term Contempt of Court

If examined terminologically, contempt of court it is defined as an act committed intentionally to ignore or disobey the orders of a legitimate authority according to the law.

Contempt of court according to Black’s Law Dictionary is any act that can be considered to embarrass, obstruct or hinder the judicial duties of the judicial bodies or any act that can reduce its authority or dignity. The act is carried out intentionally against its authority or thwarting the judicial duties carried out by someone by being a party in the case being tried who intentionally disobeys a legitimate court order.

Contempt of court can also be described as an act that essentially interferes with or disrupts the judicial process or prohibits members of the public from forgiving the judicial system in resolving their disputes.