Free Nutritious Meals: Filling the Stomach, Stunting Reason?

Asis

Contributor

19 Feb 2026 · 15:23 19 February 2026 15:23 WIB 7 minutes reading time: 7 minutes 6 read

The free nutritious meals program diverts focus from the constitutional goal: to educate the nation. The state neglects the quality of education, trapped in populism.

Makan bergizi gratis, solusi instan atasi masalah gizi atau pengerdilan nalar bangsa? (Source: AI Gemini, Redaksi Literasi Hukum Indonesia)

Opinion Note

This opinion article was written by a contributor/columnist. The views expressed are entirely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors.

CONTRIBUTOR PROGRAM

You can become a columnist at Legal Literacy.

Submit your legal opinion/analysis writing. If it is published, you have the opportunity to obtain a payout/honorarium in accordance with the provisions.

Submit Article Read Guidelines

Table of Contents

The State's Failure to Differentiate Welfare and Education
Reduction of the Meaning of "Educating"
State Paternalism and the Death of the Family Role
Populism of "Bread and Circuses"
Potential for Leaks and Bureaucratic Inefficiency

Legal Literacy - In the opening of the 1945 Constitution, the founders of this nation explicitly wrote that the goal of the Indonesian nation and state is"To educate the nation." This phrase is not merely poetic rhetoric, but an imperative mandate that the nation's top priority is the cognitive development, intellectuality, and reasoning capacity of its citizens. However, today we are witnessing a sad irony. Amidst Indonesia's PISA scores (Programme for International Student Assessment) crawling at the bottom of the world, the government is instead choosing a less relevant shortcut, namely the Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG).

The narrative being built is seemingly noble, namely nutritional improvement to create a superior generation. However, if we dissect it with the knife of public policy analysis and economic theory, this program is nothing more than a dangerous diversion of focus. We are witnessing a paradigm shift of the state from The Education State to The Nanny State . The state is no longer busy thinking about how children think critically, but busy managing lunch catering menus. This is a subtle betrayal of the mandate to educate the nation.

The State's Failure to Differentiate Welfare and Education

The government seems to be experiencing confusion in distinguishing between social welfare policies (social welfare) and education policies (education policy). Feeding hungry people is the task of the Social Services or the Ministry of Health within the framework of a social safety net, not a burden on the education budget or the main focus of the nation's intelligence strategy.

When schools are burdened with public kitchen logistics, the focus of educational institutions becomes blurred. Principals and teachers, who should be focusing on pedagogy and curriculum, will be preoccupied with catering tenders, food distribution supervision, and food waste management. Theoretically, this violates the principle of division of labor initiated by Adam Smith. Schools are intellectual factories, not restaurants. Forcing biological functions (eating) into cognitive institutions (schools) without the urgency of a mass famine crisis is a form of policy dysfunction. If the goal is to overcome stunting, the target should be pregnant women and toddlers (the first 1000 days of life), not school-age children whose critical period of brain growth has passed.