Legal Literacy - This article discusses the complexities of addiction online gambling in Indonesia and the discourse on providing social assistance to the victims. Although there are arguments in favor because it is considered a moral responsibility of the government, concerns also arise regarding the potential misuse of the assistance, which could worsen addiction. In addition, the rapidly growing phenomenon of online gambling in Indonesia also highlights the expansion of internet access and anonymity that facilitates this activity, posing new challenges in law enforcement and social protection. This discussion underscores the need for solutions that combine legal approaches, rehabilitation, and strict social assistance to address this problem effectively.
Introduction
The controversy surrounding the provision of social assistance to online gambling victims has become a hot topic among the public lately. This idea emerged as an effort to help those who are caught in the trap of online gambling addiction, which often ends in financial and social problems. However, like two sides of a coin, this discourse has also sparked fierce pros and cons in various circles. Many people believe that online gambling is a complex bad habit of society, where victims are often trapped in a vicious cycle of addiction that is difficult to break. Â Â
Some people believe that the government has a moral obligation to protect its citizens from the adverse effects of increasingly widespread online gambling. By providing assistance, the government not only helps the victims financially but also demonstrates a commitment to combating the social problem. They believe that social assistance can be a safety net for the victims, helping them recover from financial distress and restore their lives back on track.
On the other hand, many people also voice concerns about the potential provision of social assistance. They argue that online gambling is an illegal act that should not be tolerated by the government. By providing assistance, there are concerns that the government may seem to justify or even support the activity, which is certainly contrary to ongoing law enforcement efforts. They argue that giving funds to online gambling victims could reinforce their addiction and encourage irresponsible behavior. In addition, the provision of social assistance also absorbs funding sources that can drain the state budget.
Furthermore, some parties assume that providing social assistance to online gambling victims could create a dangerous situation, where the public might demand similar assistance for victims of other illegal activities, such as drugs or theft. This could open the door to endless demands and ultimately overload the country's social welfare system. However, there are also parties who are trying to find a middle ground. They propose that social assistance be provided with strict requirements, such as proving addiction and a commitment to undergoing therapy or rehabilitation. Thus, the assistance is not only financial but also encourages sustainable recovery efforts. In addition, there is a proposal to allocate a portion of social assistance funds to prevention and education programs regarding the dangers of online gambling. By raising public awareness, it is hoped that it can reduce the number of new victims and create a healthier and safer environment for future generations.
Behind the pros and cons, it shows the need for the involvement of all stakeholders, including the government, non-governmental organizations, academics and civil society, to find comprehensive and balanced solutions. Only through close collaboration and a holistic approach can the problem of online gambling be resolved effectively and its negative impacts minimized.
Comments (0)
Write a comment