Legal Literacy - Many people are newly searching for articles on theft not because of "legal curiosity," but becausethey have just lost something: a wallet disappears in a crowd, a cellphone is lost in a cafe, a motorcycle vanishes in a parking lot, or groceries are taken from a minimarket.
The problem is, when you ask around or search the internet, the answers are often contradictory: some say "only a fine," some say "up to 9 years," some say "if it's small, it won't be processed." In fact, in the New Criminal Code, theft is tiered—depending on the modus operandi, the location, the way the perpetrator acts, and the impact.
How to Read “What is the Punishment” in the New Criminal Code (So You Don't Misunderstand)
The first thing to understand: the number written in the article (for example, “a maximum of 5 years”) is the maximum limit, not an automatic verdict. So, don't imagine that every thief is immediately “sentenced to 5 years.” Court decisions still consider many factors: how it was done, intent, consequences for the victim, value of the goods, and the perpetrator's attitude after the incident.
At this point, the most relevant “expert opinion” for the general public is the principle of proportionality of punishment. In modern criminal policy, punishment is not just about “revenge,” but also considers prevention, recovery, and social impact. Therefore, two theft cases that look similar can end differently if the context is different.
The second thing: the New Criminal Code uses a categorical finesystem. This is not a style of “making it complicated,” but rather to make fines more consistent and easily adjusted to economic conditions. That is, when you read “category II fine,” there is a rupiah figure—and that helps the reader because it is more concrete.
Write a comment