Legal Literacy- World News Day (World News Day) which falls on September 28 should be a celebration of the victory of journalism. However, in the midst of the current situation, this celebration feels like a bitter irony—like dancing on the grave of the mass media. When political buzzers dominate the timeline with millions of rupiah, professional journalists are forced to compete with anonymous accounts that have no moral responsibility. If we look at the situation in Indonesia in the last few months, we can clearly see how social media has become an arena for incredibly heated narrative battles. Remember the massive demonstrations in August-September 2025? The wave of protests stemmed from public disgust at the attitude of the political elite. Videos of council members dancing in the midst of a crisis, followed by controversial statements about salaries, exploded on the timeline. Some people who were initially indifferent eventually became angry. Public anger peaked after tragic news emerged about an online motorcycle taxi driver who died after being run over by a tactical vehicle during the action. The moments of the incident went viral everywhere, triggering widespread solidarity and anger. However, the situation became even more complicated with the presence of political buzzers. In Indonesia, the existence of buzzers can be identified through anonymous social media accounts that often create provocative, intimidating and tendentious narratives. Instead of helping to clarify information, they actually muddy the waters with various counter-narratives. Some try to underestimate the victims, some are busy diverting the issue, and some deliberately amplify the provocation. In essence, buzzers manipulate public emotions for certain political interests. This phenomenon shows how buzzers are no longer small actors on the periphery. Buzzers on social media can also be called opinion makers (opinion makers) for their central and dynamic role. They present information wrapped in photos, digital posters, videos and stories that are designed to be attractive and easy to understand. The aim is for netizens to be interested in themselves and follow the reasoning of the information maker. They have networks, funds and often move in an organized manner. Unfortunately, some media outlets are being swept along. Instead of upholding journalistic standards, they broadcast news without verification, even complying with certain orders. As a result, the media, which should be an anchor of truth, has instead become part of the propaganda machine. This is the reason why