Social, Political, and Psychological Implications of the Surat Ijo Land Conflict

The status of residents on Surat Ijo land is often considered lower than those who have legitimate ownership rights. This inequality contributes to feelings of injustice and marginalization, especially as it often becomes campaign material in election cycles. The lack of legitimate land ownership by residents causes social stigma and feelings of inferiority that affect their well-being. These psychological implications are important for understanding the broader impact of land ownership on society in Surabaya.

This article emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to resolving the Surat Ijo land conflict with a focus on legal clarity, multi-agency involvement, and the overall goal of justice for affected residents. The phenomenon of "Surat Ijo Land Conflict in Surabaya" reflects a deep complexity, where various dimensions, from social, political, to psychological, play an important role in creating fair solutions for affected residents and demanding more substantial changes in land governance. inferiority that affects their well-being. These psychological implications are important for understanding the broader impact of land ownership on society in Surabaya.

This article emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to resolving the Surat Ijo land conflict with a focus on legal clarity, multi-agency involvement, and the overall goal of justice for affected residents. The phenomenon of "Surat Ijo Land Conflict in Surabaya" reflects a deep complexity, where various dimensions, from social, political, to psychological, play an important role in creating fair solutions for affected residents and demanding more substantial changes in land governance.