Opini di atas merupakan pandangan pribadi Nicholas Martua Siagian berdasarkan kajian akademik, tinjauan di lapangan, serta pengalaman, bukan mewakili institusi negara manapun.
The Chaos of Judicial Review Rights in the Supreme Court
A comprehensive reform of the Supreme Court's authority in administering Judicial Review Rights
Opinion Note
This opinion article was written by a contributor/columnist. The views expressed are entirely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors.
CONTRIBUTOR PROGRAM
You can become a columnist at Legal Literacy.
Submit your legal opinion/analysis writing. If it is published, you have the opportunity to obtain a payout/honorarium in accordance with the provisions.
An independent judicial power is expected to be able to exercise control over the quality of regulations under the law which are legislative and executive products. However, a guarantee of the independence of this institution absolutely needs to be followed up with a transparent and accountable regulation testing process.Various laws that regulate the authority of the Supreme Court to test regulations under the law do not regulate much about the procedural law for examining applications for testing regulations under the law. The law delegates the regulation of procedural law in the form of a Supreme Court Regulation.Currently, the procedural law for testing regulations under the law is regulated in Perma Number 1 of 2011 concerning Material Review Rights. The Perma does not regulate the process of examining applications for testing regulations openly and involving the parties.A thorough reform is needed regarding the authority of the Supreme Court in administering Material Review Rights. The Coordinating Ministry for Legal Affairs, Human Rights, Immigration and Corrections, the Supreme Court, Bappenas, and related institutions need to further study the revision of the Perma, so that it can streamline the implementation of the authority to test regulations under the law as a form of control over legislative and executive power in forming regulations.The opinion above is the personal view of Nicholas Martua Siagian based on academic studies, field reviews, and experience, and does not represent any state institution.Perlu reformasi menyeluruh terhadap kewenangan Mahkamah Agung dalam menyelenggarakan Hak Uji Materiil. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia, Imigrasi, dan Pemasyarakatan, Mahkamah Agung, Bappenas, dan lembaga terkait perlu mengkaji lebih lanjut revisi Perma tersebut, sehingga bisa mengefektifkan pelaksanaan kewenangan pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang sebagai bentuk kontrol kekuasaan legislatif dan eksekutif dalam membentuk regulasi.
Support
• Indonesian Legal Literacy
Read more comfortably, while supporting literacy.
Join Membership or submit your article for publication.
Membership
Read without ads, focus more, and access premium features.
Submit Article
Submit your writing—we curate and help publish it. If it is published, you have the opportunity to earn points/payouts according to the terms.
Related Articles
See morePopular Articles
Latest News
View all newsPublic Space
See AllPasang Iklan
Write a comment