Legal Literacy-Constitutional Court Decision (MK) Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020becomes a milestone in Indonesian legislative democracy. For the first time, the concept ofmeaningful public participation (meaningful participation)is affirmed as a constitutional obligation. The public is no longer just involved as a formality, but must be given the right to be heard (right to be heard), the right to be considered (right to be considered), and the right to be explained (right to be explained). Following up on this decision, Law Number 13 of 2022 was born which explicitly opens the door for online public participation, or what is globally known ase-participation. The hope is that information and communication technology (ICT) will become a bridge that brings the people closer to their representatives, creating a more transparent, inclusive and responsive legislative process. However, after several years, this promise of digital participation still feels far from expectations. Various participation portals built by the government and the DPR seem deserted, and substantial dialogue between policymakers and the public in cyberspace is almost unheard of. So, why aren't these digital channels effective? What are the fundamental problems that hinder the realization ofe-participationmeaningful in Indonesia? This article, referring to an in-depth analysis by Mochamad Adli Wafi and Muhammad Machshush Bill Izzi, will evaluate the bleak picture of the implementation ofe-participationcurrently, comparing it with successful practices in other countries, and formulating four pillars of reform to collect the promise of true digital participation.