Framing Hope in Digital Power
Responding to this condition, the public expects the Constitutional Court to position itself strategically to innovate in a visionary and adaptive manner in the face of disruptive phenomena while remaining oriented towards the principles of democracy, justice and protection of human rights.
This also includes the transformation of the construction of the legal foundation, the legal structure which includes law enforcement apparatus, adequate infrastructure facilities and infrastructure, and the realization of the quality of community resources that are enlightened on constitutional values.
If these three indicators (structure, substance, culture) are met, then, as stated by Prof. Soerjono Soekanto, the effectiveness of the legal system has been fulfilled.
Meanwhile, in the context of the existence of artificial intelligence technology (Artificial Intelligence) which lately has begun to fill various strategic sectors (education, economy, social, culture and law), the Constitutional Court needs to consider its use wisely, not in order to replace the main role of humans who have an authentic optic regarding justice and human values that are not owned by robotic senses, but rather placing AI as an alternative media to support the implementation of trials as a form of implementation of the principle of fast, simple and low-cost trials.
Therefore, the transformation of interaction carried out by the Constitutional Court should not be carried out in ways that will sacrifice, alienate or even segregate values that are far more essential, namely constitutional rights.
Furthermore, in response to the complexity of the challenges that the Constitutional Court will face in the future, the public hopes that various efforts should be immediately implemented consistently, in sync with the speed of digital technology so that there is no legal vacuum in national and state life so that the rights of the community in obtaining justice are not marginalized due to pragmatic considerations oriented towards the efficiency sector.
In short, in interpreting the phenomenon of technological disruption today, the public hopes that the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia will continue to operate on its main principle as "The Guardian of Constitution" with the hope that the climate of state administration will run stably from the potential for despotism in the digital era, realizing constitutional supremacy, distributing justice, democratization and protection and respect for human rights which are always guaranteed by the constitution.
Write a comment