This is because the unavailability of clear legal foundation arrangements in regulating the existence of AI results in the rate of utilization of the technology not being explored and mastered optimally, especially in developing Legal Technology.

In line with the utilization Artificial Intelligence, in practice, its use still contains controversy and concerns about causing legal implications for violations of human rights such as in the sector of freedom of expression, the right to privacy security, data protection and other interactions that are digitally connected.

Meanwhile, in judicial practice, the implementation of AI needs to be re-examined and viewed wisely in producing a judicial decision through AI assistance so as not to cause alienation of the sense of justice because of pragmatic things.

This is in line with an article published by Unesco entitled: "AI and the Rule of Law: Capacity Building for Judicial Systems", that the use of AI in practice still poses various challenges that must be overcome such as pattern recognition, ethics, biased decisions taken by AI-based algorithms, transparency, and accountability.

Therefore, this anxiety should be anticipated by the Constitutional Court to ensure that the climate of democracy and protection of citizens' constitutional rights is guaranteed amidst unlimited digital resistance.

In the last few years, the Constitutional Court has experienced a transformation and transition of paradigms, structural and work culture. This can be seen from several improvement efforts that have been carried out consistently by mobilizing digital interactions, streamlining workflows and procedures that hinder efficiency without eliminating the constitutional rights of all citizens.