The argument built regarding the validity of the law formation process is based on the provisions governing the procedural aspects of law formation. Consequently, if it is proven that a law is considered procedurally flawed, the court does not prevent the legislative body from re-enacting the same law, as long as it is then followed by a proper formation process.[10] 

Read Also: Problems with the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Regarding the Postponement of Elections

References

  • [1]Harun Al Rasyid, “Masalah “Judicial Review”, a paper presented at the Hearing on “Judicial Review” at the Department of Justice and Human Rights, Jakarta, 2003, p. 2.
  • [2]Jimly Asshiddiqie, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2005), pp. 62-63.
  • [3]Ibid., pp. 63-64.
  • [4]Tim Penyusun, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Revised Edition (Jakarta: Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2020), p. 163. See also, Sri Soemantri, Hak Uji Material Di Indonesia, Third Printing (Bandung: Alumni, 1982), p. 28.
  • [5]Jimly, Op.Cit., p. 64.
  • [6]Ibid., p. 65.
  • [7] Ibid.
  • [8] Suzie Navot, “Judicial Review of the Legislative Process.” Israael Law Review 39, No. 2 (Summer 2006), p. 182.
  • [9] Zaka Firma Aditya and Abdul Basid Fuadi, “Konsep Kedudukan Hukum Pemohon dalam Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi” (Jakarta:Raja Grafindo, 2022), p. 13.
  • [10] Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov, “The Role of Courts in Improving the Legislative Process.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 3, No. 3 (2015), pp. 295-313.