Hopes for Creating More Guaranteed Security for Judges

So the response as an internal and external supervisory institution should be able to find a middle ground to prevent PMKH from happening to a judge. One way is to supervise and protect judges after a judge decides a court decision, because the potential for PMKH besides in the court can also occur outside the court, namely after the decision is read out by the judge. This preventive action can be evidence to maximize the duties and roles of an internal and external supervisory institution towards a judge.

Therefore, the role of supervisory institutions, both internal and external supervisory institutions, is very necessary in providing protection to a judge or known as judge advocacy, because the main target of PMKH is directed at a judge in carrying out his duties as an enforcer of the court. In carrying out the task of providing protection to judges, it is not only needed when PMKH has occurred and been reported, but it is also much more needed before PMKH occurs so that the worst possible thing that will happen to the judge can be prevented because there is supervision and protection carried out by internal and external supervisory institutions.