Law Enforcement Challenges and Harun Masiku's Debt of Pursuit

The Harun Masiku case, with all its twists and turns, has been going on for a long time and has passed through several election cycles. The existence of Harun Masiku who is still a fugitive to this day is a reflection of various obstruction efforts and also the slow handling by law enforcement officials. ICW's doubts about Harun Masiku's cleverness in hiding, and the alleged obstruction efforts and slow prosecution of other parties involved, are a reflection of public perception about the incompleteness of this case substantively. Substantive justice demands that the case be resolved to its roots, not stopping at the verdict against one or two individuals. As long as Harun Masiku is still a fugitive, this chain of crime has not been broken. Law enforcement officials, especially the KPK, have a great responsibility to continue to hunt down and arrest Harun Masiku, and uncover the entire network involved in this PAW bribery case. The success of arresting Harun Masiku will be proof of the seriousness of law enforcement in achieving true justice, namely uncovering all material truths and dragging all parties responsible to the green table. In addition, this case also highlights the importance of coordination and synergy between law enforcement agencies. Harun Masiku's fugitive for many years raises big questions about the effectiveness of search and arrest efforts. Are there weaknesses in coordination, or even alleged political intervention that hinders the process? These questions must be answered with concrete and transparent actions from law enforcement officials. In the context of progressive law enforcement, the court should be an arena to seek material truth and uphold justice as fairly as possible, not just apply the law textually. Judges have a central role in ensuring that every decision not only meets legal formalities, but also reflects a sense of justice in society. If the judge's decision feels anticlimactic and disproportionate to the impact of the crime, it will weaken public trust in the justice system and corruption eradication efforts.