Stop Hiding Behind “Individuals”
Some of us may realize that not a few of the mass media in reporting criminal acts that drag members of an institution always have the term “individuals” attached. The use of this term seems to be increasingly widespread because it is believed to be able to separate criminal acts from the institution that houses the perpetrators.
Often, the term “individuals” is used as a shield when violations occur that are considered contrary to the duties of an institution, such as maintaining public safety and order, enforcing the law, and protecting, nurturing, and serving the public.
This phenomenon of “individualization” is inseparable from the warm discussions among netizens, which then gave birth to new hashtags on social media, such as #satuharisatuoknum. This hashtag is used to describe the weak performance and the rampant crimes committed by law enforcement officials.
It is undeniable that the affixing of the terminology “individuals” to members who make mistakes seems to be another part of the institution's efforts to wash their hands and responsibility.
In any case, those who are labeled as “individuals” are included in the sub-system of the institution, so it is only fitting as an inseparable component and it is attached to the position, it is only appropriate to conduct an evaluation, not just clarification.
Comments
0Share your perspective politely, stay relevant, and focus on the article. Comments appear after moderation.
Join the discussion
Write a clear, polite response that stays on topic.
No comments yet. Be the first to discuss.
Comments will appear after moderation.