Conclusion: Weak State Asset Governance

The Citraland North Sumatra land case is not just a land dispute, but a reflection of weak state asset governance and supervision in the national land system. The change from HGU to HGB should pay attention to the principles of agrarian law, the social function of land, and the public interest. Through transparent and fair law enforcement, it is hoped that the management of state assets in the future can run in a more orderly manner and be oriented towards the prosperity of the people.

References

  1. Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles.
  2. Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Condominium Units, and Land Registration.
  3. Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes.
  4. Analisadaily. (2025). Kejati Sumut Investigates Alleged Corruption of Citraland Land.
  5. DetikSumut. (2025). Citraland Case: North Sumatra Prosecutor's Office Names BPN Official as Suspect.
  6. Strateginews. (2025). Alleged Violations in the Change of Land Use Rights of PTPN I to Citraland's Building Use Rights.