Legal Literacy- The Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) as the main source of operationalizing criminal procedural law has been in effect for quite a long time, namely forty years, so that in that quite a long time, there should be shortcomings in the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code in the enforcement of material criminal law and formal criminal law. Indonesian criminal procedural law since 1981 has been regulated by Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code. With the enactment of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, it has actually caused fundamental changes, both conceptually and implementally, to the procedures for resolving criminal cases in Indonesia. However, with the increasing complexity of criminal law problems that must be handled and the many international instruments that inspire criminal law enforcement, the Criminal Procedure Code in some cases is beginning to be felt to be no longer in accordance with the aspirations and demands of society.

Problems with the Criminal Procedure Code

Absence of Understanding of Criminal Acts and Criminal Liability

The problems that exist in the current Criminal Procedure Code, for example, the absence of regulation of the definition of criminal acts and criminal liability in the Criminal Procedure Code. Thus, with the absence of regulation of the definition of criminal acts criminallya and criminal liability raises problems in implementation with differences in interpretation of the implementation of criminal acts and criminal liability in criminal law enforcement in Indonesia.
Even though it is known that Indonesia, which was formerly a Dutch colony, was influenced by the teachingscriminal lawDutch which is monistic. Where in this monistic view basically sees the issue of "responsibility" as part of a "criminal act". Thus, in the monistic view, a "criminal act" automatically includes the ability to be responsible. Against this monistic view, dualistic thinking has also begun to develop in Indonesia.