JDIH LHIConstitutional Court Decisions

PUU Year 2020 14 Jan 2021 07:29:00 WIB

88/PUU-XVIII/2020

Pengujian Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang terhadap UUD 1945

Case issue

Pengujian Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Uta...

The issue or case summary most useful for rapid decision scanning.

Applicant

Ashvin Bayudewa, Aryo Bryanto Kamajaya, Ir. Febyawan Chandra Wardhana, MBA., dkk

The applicant or primary party recorded for this decision.

Outcome type

Tidak Dapat Diterima

The short outcome most often needed during rapid case scanning.

Decision file

Available

Availability of a local PDF copy or an official document path.

Decision outcome

The main result section typically sought first during legal research.

Tidak Dapat Diterima

Case summary

A concise summary of the constitutional issue or petition under review.

Pengujian Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang terhadap UUD 1945

Applicant

The party or entity filing the petition.

Ashvin Bayudewa, Aryo Bryanto Kamajaya, Ir. Febyawan Chandra Wardhana, MBA., dkk

Keywords

Short terms that support follow-up research.

konsumen/pembeli apartemen/rumah susun sebagai pemegang hak agunan atas kebendaan lainnya

Cari dalam dokumen ini

Isi PDF belum tersedia di indeks pencarian.

Constitutional Court Decisions

Full metadata

A concise summary of the constitutional issue or petition under review.

Case number	88/PUU-XVIII/2020
Case type	PUU
Number	88
Year	2020
Date	14 Jan 2021
Time	07:29:00 WIB
Outcome type	Tidak Dapat Diterima
Downloads	232,007
Tanggal Str	14 Januari 2021
Waktu Str	07:29 WIB
No Perkara	88/PUU-XVIII/2020
Pokok Perkara	Pengujian Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang terhadap UUD 1945
Pemohon	Ashvin Bayudewa, Aryo Bryanto Kamajaya, Ir. Febyawan Chandra Wardhana, MBA., dkk
Amar Putusan	Tidak Dapat Diterima
Jenis Amar Putusan	Tidak Dapat Diterima
Diunduh	232007
Kata Kunci	konsumen/pembeli apartemen/rumah susun sebagai pemegang hak agunan atas kebendaan lainnya
File Pendukung	Klik Disini
Pdf Url	https://s.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_7299.pdf
Source Used	mkri

Constitutional Court Decisions

Actions

Use filters to narrow the results, then open details or download the official document.

Download PDF Official MKRI PDF Official source

Workspace Riset

Riset Dokumen Ini

Simpan dokumen ini, lanjutkan pencarian istilah, atau buka workspace riset pribadi.

Simpan ke Riset Riset topik

Constitutional Court Decisions

Ready to cite

Copy a quick citation or permanent link for research notes, memos, or working papers.

Standard citation

Constitutional Court Decision No. 88/PUU-XVIII/2020 (14 Jan 2021)

Short reference

88/PUU-XVIII/2020

This format is intended as a practical starting point. Adjust it to match your internal or academic citation style.

Constitutional Court Decisions

Case type

Case number 88/PUU-XVIII/2020

Decision date 14 Jan 2021

Applicant Ashvin Bayudewa, Aryo Bryanto Kamajaya, Ir. Febyawan Chandra Wardhana, MBA., dkk

File availability Available

Constitutional Court Decisions

Related decisions

Legal intelligence

Continue your legal research from one hub

Move from legal updates into primary materials, references, and practical document tools without losing context.

Database

Regulations

Browse statutes, government regulations, presidential regulations, and regional regulations.

Open regulations →

Case law

Constitutional Court decisions

Search constitutional review decisions, case numbers, years, and downloadable files.

Open decisions →

Reference

Legal dictionary

Read terms, legal maxims, categories, examples, and authoritative references.

Open dictionary →

Utility

Document templates

Find practical templates, draft examples, and legal materials that support legal work.

Open templates →