Constitutional Court Decision Number 125/PUU-XXI/2024 reinterprets the rubber articles of the ITE Law to guarantee freedom of expression in the digital space. Criticism and expectations are thoroughly examined.

Literasi Hukum - Every time the Constitutional Court (Constitutional Court) issues a controversial and far-reaching decision—such as Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the age limit for presidential and vice-presidential candidates...

Constitutional Court Decision Number 119/PUU-XXIII/2025 is a new hope for environmental activists in Indonesia. This decision strengthens the Anti-SLAPP mechanism to prevent the criminalization of environmental defenders who voice...

Revisiting the meaning and limits of corporations as 'legal subjects'. A philosophical deconstruction of the persona ficta concept.

Literasi Hukum - The pace of sports development in Indonesia shows rapid dynamics, not only in terms of achievement but also in the governance of its organization. One interesting phenomenon lately...

Constitutional Court decides! The deadline for filing a termination of employment lawsuit of 1 year is now calculated from the failure of mediation or conciliation, not from the date of termination. Check out the latest Constitutional Court Decision.

Learn about the valid procedures, evidentiary power, and effective requirements of civil summons in resolving disputes in court.

Constitutional Court rejects the judicial review of the Law on Traffic and Road Transportation (UU LLAJ) regarding traffic light that are considered discriminatory for color blind people. The Constitutional Court emphasizes that the government must accommodate the needs of people with disabilities.

The Constitutional Court affirms that columnists & freelance contributors are still protected by law. Protection via the Press Law if they meet the requirements of journalists, or other laws related to human rights.

The Constitutional Court stated that it could not accept the lawsuit requesting a change of name from “Sumatera Selatan” to “Sumatra Selatan” because the petitioner was deemed to lack legal standing.