Dissolve the Faculty of Law or Fix the System?
The call to "Dissolve the Faculty of Law" is not just emotional anger, but a harsh criticism of the legal education system that has failed to create change. The Faculty of Law should not be a place to produce professionals who ultimately only become tools of the oligarchy. If the law remains a plaything of the elites and there is no room for change, then the existence of the Faculty of Law only prolongs the illusion of justice.
However, is the only solution to dissolve the Faculty of Law? Or is there still hope to fix the system?
If the Faculty of Law wants to remain relevant, then it must undergo total reform. Students should not only be crammed with theory, but should be taught how to deal with the rottenness of the law in the field. Legal education must be the basis of resistance, not just an entrance for those who want to get rich from the corrupt legal industry.
The Faculty of Law must dare to teach reality from an early age, not lull students to sleep with empty theories. There must be courses that discuss how to deal with the legal mafia, how to fight bribery and political intervention, and how to build a legal system that really works.
But if that change is impossible, if the Faculty of Law remains a nest of academics who turn a blind eye to reality, if law graduates continue to be part of a rotten system, then it may be true: it is better to just dissolve the Faculty of Law.
Comments
0Share your perspective politely, stay relevant, and focus on the article. Comments appear after moderation.
Join the discussion